Skip to content
PromoVeritas
PromoVeritas
Contact Us
PromoVeritas
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do and Why
  • Our Work
  • News
  • Join the Team
  • Contact

ASA Rulings – April 2022

Jack Rogers April 8, 2022

This month, the ASA Rulings revolved around misleading claims, whether they related to pricing, savings or effectiveness of treatments. Emily Vickers, from the PromoVeritas legal team takes a look at some examples and talks us through where they went wrong.

Back to Normal:    

The Advert:

A website and GoFundMe page for the anti-lockdown campaign group Back to Normal made a series of claims for the effectiveness of the drug ivermectin in treating Covid-19. Text on their website stated “The evidence is clear ivermectin prevents and treats Covid 19 it breaks the chain of infection” and “when used on patients with Covid 19 there is a 75% reduction in mortality … for healthy people studies suggest it reduces the risk of infection by 89% … 100% of the first 46 studies report statistically significant positive effects …”. At the bottom of the page there was a link to the GoFundMe page with the word ‘contribute’. The GoFundMe page then asked for donations with text in the updates section of the campaign stating “… I remain completely convinced that ivermectin is the covid killer and all that is needed to end this covid nonsense completely”

The Complaint:

The complainant challenged whether the claims that ivermectin could prevent and treat Covid-19 were misleading.

The Defence:

Back to Normal responded saying they believed that ivermectin was beneficial in the treatment of Covid-19 and provided links to three websites which they believed supported the claims they made. Back to Normal also sent the ASA YouTube videos and podcast episodes where the use of ivermectin to treat Covid-19 were discussed.

The Ruling:

UPHELD – The ASA felt that consumers were likely to understand the claims made by Back to Normal that ivermectin was an effective and reliable option for the treatment of those with Covid-19 and prevention of Covid-19 in those who were not infected.

The websites, YouTube videos and podcast episodes that Back to Normal provided did not contain information that was in line with official guidance on the use of ivermectin and the ASA were not provided with full versions of specific studies to support the ads claims. The ASA did not consider that the videos, which contained individual opinions from a Dr with a non-medical doctoral degree in nursing education on the results of a study, as adequate evidence to substantiate the claims. They also did not consider a podcast as adequate evidence.

Rules Breached:

CAP Code – 3.1 – misleading advertising, 3.7 – substantiation.

Lessons to be learnt:

All adverts and promotions which make any claims must have reliable and valid evidence to reinforce them. Furthermore brands should not make claims around the effectiveness of medicines when they have not been approved for the treatment they are making the claim about.

Emma Matratzen GmbH t/a Emma Mattress:

The Advert:

A product page on the website advertised an Emma Premium Mattress UK King Size for £637.45. Text above the selling price stated “45% savings” and “From £1,159.00” which had been crossed out. Another page advertised an Emma Luxe Mattress UK Double for £1039.95. Text above the selling price stated “39% savings” and “From £1,728.00” which had been crossed out. The website homepage stated, “FLASH SALE UP TO 50% OFF” and was accompanied by a countdown clock. And finally, a London Underground poster featured the text “EMMA’S BIGGEST EVER SALE BLACK FRIDAY UP TO 50% OFF”.

The Complaint:

  1. Complaints received about the first webpage stated that they believed the “From” price had been increased and so challenged whether the savings claim was misleading.
  2. The complainant understood the product in the ad was a new release and challenged whether ad complied with the code.
  3. The complainant challenged whether the use of the countdown clock misleadingly implied that the sales promotion was time limited as they understood that the same discount offer would restart shortly after the countdown ended.
  4. The compliant challenged whether “BLACK FRIDAY UP TO 50% OFF” was misleading.

The Defence:

  1. Emma Mattress provided pricing history that covered a 7-month period. The reference price had fluctuated over the period due to their supplier increasing their own prices. Emma said that over the 7-month period they had sold 15,392 units, 2,634 had been sold at the reference price applicable at the time.
  2. Emma said the ad stated “pre-sale” and considered that this would indicate to customers that the product was new to the market. However, they accepted that the ad should have been clearer in explaining that it was an introductory offer.
  3. Emma said that the “Flash Sale” which offered the discount of up to 50% off for all customers ended at midnight on 18/10/21 and the sale which immediately followed on 19/10/21 did not offer a discount of up to 50% off and was only available to new customers.
  4. Emma said that the sale ran from 15 – 29 November 2021 and the ad was not misleading as it prominently stated it was a black Friday sale, it did not state that sale had already started. They considered that the average consumer would understand that the promotion would be running for the Black Friday weekend.

The Ruling:

  1. UPHELD – the ASA had not seen evidence that the savongs clam represented a genuine saving against the usual selling price of the product and so they concluded that the savings claim was misleading.
  2.  UPHELD – the ASA considered that Emma intended the offer to be an introductory offer, the Code allowed for the use of introductory offers provided that it was clear that the lower price was an introductory price rather than discount against the usual selling price. The ASA said they had not seen any evidence to demonstrate the higher price represented the price at which the mattress was usually sold and concluded that the ad was misleading.
  3. UPHELD – the ASA considered that countdown clock was likely to pressurise consu,ers into making a swift transactional decision without giving due consideration because of the misleading implication in the ad that the offer would run out at the end of the time period. As another sale started immediately after, the promotion was not time limited and so was misleading.
  4. UPHELD – the ASA considered that it was not unreasonable for a consumer to think the promotion would be running at the time the ad was seen, due to the increase in length of Black Friday promotions. They considered that the start and end date of the promotion was significant information which needed to be included.

Rules Breached:

CAP Code – 3.1 – misleading advertising, 3.7 – substantiation, 3.17 – pricing. 8.17.4.e – promotional marketing, 8.17 – significant conditions.

Lessons to be learnt:

Again it is clear how important substantiation is in relation to savings claims and how important it is for brands to not mislead their consumers and to not omit significant information.  

In the Style Fashion Ltd:

The Advert:

The brand had Instagram stories which stated “I’m so excited for you all to get your hands on my edit with 50% off from the moment it launches! Don’t forget guys once it’s gone it’s gone and it won’t be restocked” and “LIVE IN ONE HOUR WITH 50% OFF GET READY. YOU CAN’T MISS THIS”. The website stated, “THE BLACK FRIDAY COLLECTION”, “50% OFF JESS MILLICHAMP” and featured images of different products which stated the price of “£42.00” which was crossed out in black and “£21.00” written next to it in red.

The Complaint:

Two complainants understood that the clothing collections had not been available to purchase before and would not be available for sale at a higher price once sold out, and so challenged whether the claim 50% off was misleading.

The Defence:

In The Style confirmed that the 50% off promotions which involved the Natasha Sandhu and Jess Millichamp collections were introductory offers and acknowledged that they had not been advertised as such. They also said they intended to sell the items at full price when the sales period ended.  

The Ruling:

UPHELD – the ASA felt that consumers would have understood the ads claims of 50% off represented a genuine discount against an established, usual selling price. As consumers were likely to see the higher price as the usual selling price, and that was not the case, the ads were misleading for that reason. Also, even if the ads had made clear that the lower price was an introductory one, the savings claim would nevertheless have been misleading because the prices did not go up to the stated reference price once the sale had ended. As the ASA had not been provided with any evidence that the collections had been previously been sold at a higher selling price, and because the prices had not increased to the stated reference prices at the end of the introductory period, they concluded that the savings claims had not been substantiated and were therefore misleading.

Rules Breached

CAP Code – 3.1 – misleading advertising, 3.7 – substantiation, 3.17 – prices.

Lessons to be learnt:

Any promotions including future introductory offers are clearly labelled as such, and as above, brands need to ensure that they hold relevant pricing substantiation for their savings claims in the future.

If you are planning any kind of prize promotion, giveaway, competition or instant win PromoVeritas can help with all your legal, operational and digital needs and ensure you never receive an ASA Ruling. Contact us here or call us on +44 203 325 6000.

« Top Tips for Running Promotions in Qatar  ‘Try Me Free’ at your peril: Are Free Trial marketing tactics a thing of the past? »

Call us on 0203 325 6000 to find out how we can help your promotion

+44 (0)203 325 6000
info@promoveritas.com
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do and Why
  • Our Work
  • News
  • Join the Team
  • Contact
Proud members of ISO-27001 Accredited Proud members of
Run it Right.
© 2023 PromoVeritas
Privacy Policy Terms of Service Website Terms & Conditions Cookies Policy
We use cookies on our website. All the cookies we use can be viewed using the Cookie Settings button. By clicking “ACCEPT” you consent to the use of all cookies. You cannot disable our essential cookies.
Do not sell my personal information.
Read More
ACCEPTCookie settings
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Essential
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

CookieTypeDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary011 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-non-necessary011 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Non Necessary".
viewed_cookie_policy011 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Non Essential

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.

CookieTypeDurationDescription
_ga01 yearThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to calculate visitor, session, camapign data and keep track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookies store information anonymously and assigns a randoly generated number to identify unique visitors.
_gat_UA-15728851-301 minuteThis is a pattern type cookie set by Google Analytics, where the pattern element on the name contains the unique identity number of the account or website it relates to. It appears to be a variation of the _gat cookie which is used to limit the amount of data recorded by Google on high traffic volume websites.
_gid01 dayThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to store information of how visitors use a website and helps in creating an analytics report of how the wbsite is doing. The data collected including the number visitors, the source where they have come from, and the pages viisted in an anonymous form.
bcookie01 yearThis cookie is set by linkedIn. The purpose of the cookie is to enable LinkedIn functionalities on the page.
bscookie11 year
csrftoken011 monthsThis cookie is associated with Django web development platform for python. Used to help protect the website against Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks
GPS030 minutesThis cookie is set by Youtube and registers a unique ID for tracking users based on their geographical location
IDE11 yearUsed by Google DoubleClick and stores information about how the user uses the website and any other advertisement before visiting the website. This is used to present users with ads that are relevant to them according to the user profile.
ig_did11 year
ig_nrcb01 year
lang0This cookie is used to store the language preferences of a user to serve up content in that stored language the next time user visit the website.
li_sugr02 months
lidc01 dayThis cookie is set by LinkedIn and used for routing.
lissc01 year
mid01 yearThe cookie is set by Instagram. The cookie is used to distinguish users and to show relevant content, for better user experience and security.
test_cookie011 months
u02 months
UserMatchHistory01 month
VISITOR_INFO1_LIVE15 monthsThis cookie is set by Youtube. Used to track the information of the embedded YouTube videos on a website.
YSC1This cookies is set by Youtube and is used to track the views of embedded videos.
Save & Accept