Skip to content
PromoVeritas
PromoVeritas
Contact Us
PromoVeritas
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do and Why
  • Our Work
  • News
  • Join the Team
  • Contact

ASA Rulings Recap October 2021

PromoVeritas October 8, 2021

Whilst recent Advertising Standards Authority rulings have focused on influencers, their latest cases highlight where brands are still getting the basics wrong. Emily Vickers, Paralegal at PromoVeritas, looks at how obvious tasks such as failing to award prizes and not fairly picking winners are getting brands into big trouble.

Prettylittlething.com

The Advert:

An Instagram post in February included the captions “VALENTINES GIVEAWAY Would you LOVE to win all these V-Day goodies” and “Including a Cartier Love Ring, A BRAND NEW Dyson Airwrap Styler, £5,000 CASH, a £500 PLT wardrobe AND a beauty bundle worth over £100”, “All you have to do to enter is”, “Double Tap & Save this post”, “Tag your best Galentines”, “Comment [heart emoji] on ANY post”, “BONUS: Share on your story”, “Enter as many times as you want”, “Must be following @prettylittlething to enter” and “Ends 11:59pm GMT February 14th”.

The Complaint:

The complainant believed that it was not possible for the promoter to track who had fulfilled the promotion’s entry conditions, challenging whether the promotion was administered fairly.

The Defence:

PrettyLitteThing.com Ltd said that they used an independent third-party website which could download a range of data from Instagram posts which allowed them to produce verifiable random results and select a winner. They took additional steps to check the eligibility of the chosen winner by manually checking that all entry requirements had been satisfied before awarding the prize.

The Ruling:

UPHELD – the CAP Code requires promoters to conduct their promotions equitably, promptly and efficiently and be seen to deal fairly and honourably with participants and potential participants. Promoters are required to avoid causing unnecessary disappointment. The CAP Code also requires promoters to ensure that prizes are awarded in accordance with the laws of chance, and unless winners were selected by a computer process that produced verifiably random results, this was done by an independent person, or under the supervision of an independent person.

Rules Breached:

CAP Code Rules 8.2 – Promotional marketing, 8.14 – Administration and 8.24 – Prize promotions.

Lessons to be learnt:

Whilst the ASA understood that PLT had a computer program to download certain data and would then choose the winner randomly, they were not certain which data the program downloaded or the other entry requirements that entrants had fulfilled. The ASA acknowledged that they could ask the potential winner to show they had fulfilled the other criteria, they considered it important that a promoter was able to independently verify that the conditions for entry were met.

The ASA also considered the route for a bonus entry but concluded that those who had met the criteria for a bonus entry would not increase their chances of winning the prize by doing so. The ASA concluded that the promotion was not fairly administered and breached the code.

Abellio East Midlands Ltd t/a East Midlands Railway:

The Advert:

A competition which featured on East Midlands Railways’ website earlier this year invited members of the public to submit ideas to help them ‘Build Back Better’, with the winner awarded £5,000.

The Complaint:

The complainant who understood that the competition was cancelled, challenged whether it breach the CAP Code.

The Defence:

Abellio said that the competition was a contractual obligation which had been agreed prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, and whilst they had not planned on running the competition under the circumstances, they decided to go ahead with it hopeful that it would generate innovative ideas. They said they received a high number of entries but that they were of a poor quality and that at that point they had started to see the financial impact of the pandemic on UK rail services, which led them to withdraw the competition. Whilst they acknowledged that this would likely cause disappointment to the entrants, they felt they had acted within the terms of the competition which stated they had a right to cancel at any point.

The Ruling:

UPHELD – The CAP Code states that promoters must conduct their promotions equitably, promptly, and efficiently, be seen to deal fairly and honourably with participants, and avoid causing unnecessary disappointment. The Code requires promoters to ensure that their promotions are conducted under proper supervision, that they made adequate resources available to administer them, to avoid giving consumers justifiable grounds for complaint. The Code also requires promoters to award prizes as described in their marketing communications, or reasonable equivalents, and stated that withholding prizes was justified only if participants had not met the qualifying criteria set out clearly in the rules of the promotion.

Whilst the ASA acknowledged that the terms and conditions of the promotion stated that they could cancel the competition, they did not absolve the advertiser of their obligation to comply with the Code. Including clauses in the terms and conditions which flout the rules does NOT protect the brand. The ASA recognised the impact of Covid-19 but the competition was launched in February 2021, nearly a year into the pandemic Abellio could have anticipated challenges that might arise before deciding to go ahead.

The competition was cancelled, and the prize of £5,000 was not awarded. The fact that Abellio had not identified any ideas that they considered would be suitable would not have prevented them from awarding the prize to the idea chosen to be the best by the judges, and the terms and conditions did not set out what would happen if none of the ideas could be implemented. The terms and conditions stated “ideas must be realistic and achievable and able to be implemented quickly and easily by the promoter”. The ASA considered that the criteria of the promotion were not clearly set out. We also need to be mindful of this when we draft terms and conditions.

Rules Breached:

CAP Code Rules 8.2, 8.14, 8.15.1, 8.26, 8.27 and 8.28.6 – Promotional marketing.

Lessons to be learnt:

The Code states that if the selection was open to subjective interpretation, a demonstrably competent, independent judge, or a panel that included one independent member, must be appointed. This had not been done. By cancelling the competition for the reasons given and not awarding the prize, Abellio had not dealt fairly with participants and had caused unnecessary disappointment, in turn breaching the Code.

Hughes TV and Audio Ltd

The Advert:

Ads appeared on their Instagram, Facebook and Twitter channels promoting a prize draw to win a washing machine.

The Complaint:

One complainant believed that the three ads on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter related to the same promotion but that it was not possible to combine all the entrants into a single draw, and so challenged whether the promotion was administered fairly.

The Defence:

Hughes said that each of the ads related to the same promotion and outlined their winner selection process and that for each of the mechanisms they would then confirm the selected winner had qualified for the competition.

The Ruling:

UPHELD – The CAP Code requires that promoters ensure prizes are awarded in accordance with the laws of chance, and unless winners were selected by a computer process that produced verifiably random results, by an independent person, or under supervision of an independent person. The complainant challenged whether the prizes were awarded in accordance with the laws of chance, they understood there was no way of combining entrants from across all platforms and selecting a winner at random. The ASA did note that Hughes had a system in place for selecting a prize winner which used a computer process that produced verifiably random results.

Rules Breached:

CAP Code Rules 8.2 – Promotional marketing, 8.4 – Administration, 8.17 and 8.17.1 – Significant conditions for promotions

Lessons to be learnt:

All of the examples this month clearly have similar lessons that can be drawn from. Whilst new rules are coming in regarding influencers and ‘green claims’ it is important that promoters and brands ensure that they continue to remember the basics of running promotions, ensuring they run promotions fairly and in accordance with the CAP Code.    

If social media promotions give you a headache why not join our Social Media Webinar this week or contact us to take advantage of our comprehensive Influencer Pack or to find out how PromoVeritas can help you to avoid ASA Rulings, bad publicity and running campaigns that pose a risk to your brand.

« Our Top 3 Ways to Beat HFSS Rules Now! Back to Basics: Games of Chance »

Call us on 0203 325 6000 to find out how we can help your promotion

+44 (0)203 325 6000
info@promoveritas.com
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do and Why
  • Our Work
  • News
  • Join the Team
  • Contact
Proud members of ISO-27001 Accredited Proud members of
Run it Right.
© 2023 PromoVeritas
Privacy Policy Terms of Service Website Terms & Conditions Cookies Policy
We use cookies on our website. All the cookies we use can be viewed using the Cookie Settings button. By clicking “ACCEPT” you consent to the use of all cookies. You cannot disable our essential cookies.
Do not sell my personal information.
Read More
ACCEPTCookie settings
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Essential
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

CookieTypeDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary011 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-non-necessary011 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Non Necessary".
viewed_cookie_policy011 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Non Essential

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.

CookieTypeDurationDescription
_ga01 yearThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to calculate visitor, session, camapign data and keep track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookies store information anonymously and assigns a randoly generated number to identify unique visitors.
_gat_UA-15728851-301 minuteThis is a pattern type cookie set by Google Analytics, where the pattern element on the name contains the unique identity number of the account or website it relates to. It appears to be a variation of the _gat cookie which is used to limit the amount of data recorded by Google on high traffic volume websites.
_gid01 dayThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to store information of how visitors use a website and helps in creating an analytics report of how the wbsite is doing. The data collected including the number visitors, the source where they have come from, and the pages viisted in an anonymous form.
bcookie01 yearThis cookie is set by linkedIn. The purpose of the cookie is to enable LinkedIn functionalities on the page.
bscookie11 year
csrftoken011 monthsThis cookie is associated with Django web development platform for python. Used to help protect the website against Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks
GPS030 minutesThis cookie is set by Youtube and registers a unique ID for tracking users based on their geographical location
IDE11 yearUsed by Google DoubleClick and stores information about how the user uses the website and any other advertisement before visiting the website. This is used to present users with ads that are relevant to them according to the user profile.
ig_did11 year
ig_nrcb01 year
lang0This cookie is used to store the language preferences of a user to serve up content in that stored language the next time user visit the website.
li_sugr02 months
lidc01 dayThis cookie is set by LinkedIn and used for routing.
lissc01 year
mid01 yearThe cookie is set by Instagram. The cookie is used to distinguish users and to show relevant content, for better user experience and security.
test_cookie011 months
u02 months
UserMatchHistory01 month
VISITOR_INFO1_LIVE15 monthsThis cookie is set by Youtube. Used to track the information of the embedded YouTube videos on a website.
YSC1This cookies is set by Youtube and is used to track the views of embedded videos.
Save & Accept